新欧洲·战法

标题: 投资书籍 [打印本页]

作者: yuchang 时间: 2008-12-4 17:46
提示: 该帖被管理员或版主屏蔽

作者: huomud 时间: 2008-12-4 18:36

鄙人无知，没听过诶！

今天见识了

作者: tsy130 时间: 2008-12-4 21:11
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: Gregory_Wang 时间: 2008-12-4 21:21
很好,这两本书在除了上证或深证外全世界都行得通

作者: 特立笃行 时间: 2008-12-4 23:42
谢谢 yuchang

The Intelligent Investor: 只有143页, 原有300多页,不是吗?

这个版本如何呢?

George Soros 是价值投资支持者吗?

这次牛市最疯狂的时候，大家也说，市盈率，　除了上证或深证外全世界都行得通，在中国就得３０，４０倍

作者: yuchang 时间: 2008-12-5 00:47
The Intelligent Investor我没看呢,真不好意思,我再找本全的
George Soros 个老巴是两个大侠级的任务了,SOROS眼里也是一样有价值的,不要因为他的几次战役就判断他不是了
还有PE这个东西,世界都一样了,我们就是VARIANCE大点罢了...制度性问题,国外泡沫也能造无限的疯狂,99,2000年美国网络股也是一样,之后恐惧造成大跌也让SOHU这样的公司严重低于价值(PRICE/CASH<<1)

作者: 特立笃行 时间: 2008-12-5 12:13
再次谢谢yuchang

1.
The Intelligent Investor
full version, english , page 641

http://diendan.sanotc.com/Upload/Tailieu/TheIntelligentInvestor-BenjaminGraham.pdf

2,
Chinese Version
http://bbs.21manager.com/dispbbs-107154-0.html
要注册，　不麻烦，　327 pages
听说翻译的一般

3.
http://www.frankvoisin.com/?p=4
这个一个"The Intelligent Investor"的summary , 20页吧, 简明扼要,我看了, 不错

Bon courage

是的，规律哪里都是一样，　不同的是政策和监管

原帖由 yuchang 于 2008-12-5 00:47 发表
The Intelligent Investor我没看呢,真不好意思,我再找本全的
George Soros 个老巴是两个大侠级的任务了,SOROS眼里也是一样有价值的,不要因为他的几次战役就判断他不是了
还有PE这个东西,世界都一样了,我们就是VARIAN ...

[ 本帖最后由特立笃行于 2008-12-7 16:00 编辑 ]

作者: 江月 时间: 2008-12-5 14:26
Merci pour les livres.

作者: 杰克 时间: 2008-12-6 00:50
怎么好像下不了了。有一个。。。

作者: xiaohe999 时间: 2008-12-6 09:59
理财这个，要看环境的。

作者: yuchang 时间: 2008-12-7 12:18
那个不能下了告诉我哦

作者: alphand1 时间: 2008-12-7 13:55
谢谢lz，
不过Benjamin Graham-Security Analysis下载后不能解压阿

作者: 特立笃行 时间: 2008-12-7 16:01
http://www.frankvoisin.com/?p=4
这个一个"The Intelligent Investor"的summary , 20页吧, 简明扼要,我看了, 不错

作者: ~Sylvie~ 时间: 2008-12-7 16:27
谢谢LZ分享！

作者: yuchang 时间: 2008-12-9 01:13
上传新书一本-非理性繁荣
希勒先生像是一位洞悉华尔街的先知。他认为投资者们正在被冲动、以众行为、席间闲谈、直觉、新闻媒体，以及不甘人后等各种非理性因素所左右。他的理论为不断蔓延的对股票市场的不安提供了及时而合理的解释。
——《纽约时报》
（这本书讲述的是）现代的、经典的、严肃的经济学理率。即使你不是这个领域的专家，也可以从中获得乐趣。
——《经济学家》“2000年最佳图书”
《非理性繁荣》是一本所有关注华尔街的人的必读之书。在今天的美国，上至格斯潘下至无名小镇上的擦鞋男孩都应读一读。
——《经济学家》

作者: chenjiejack1 时间: 2008-12-9 15:45
thank you LS.

作者: yuchang 时间: 2008-12-9 16:30
贴一段前些天明镜采访SOROS的对话

Soros: At times of recession, running a budget deficit is highly desirable. Once the economy begins to recover, you have to balance the budget. In 2010, the Bush tax cuts will expire and we should not extend them. But we will also need additional revenues. Should the government not receive them, we will all get punished with higher interest rates.
SPIEGEL: Everybody says we have to regulate the financial markets more. That sounds good, but is it realistic? Can one really tame the markets?
Soros: Between regulators and market participants, there is a cat and mouse game going on which has been going on indefinitely…
SPIEGEL: …where often the mice, the market participants, have the upper hand.
Soros: Because they got the extra boost from market fundamentalists. But the outcome was disastrous, as we see now. I think it is better to have a cat and mouse game where the cat has the upper hand than a cat and mouse game where the mice are ruling. Because the latter means that the market participants are given free range. That was actually the big misconception of our national hero Ronald Reagan, who always talked about the magic of the market.
SPIEGEL: So you support stricter regulation and more efficient control of the markets?
Soros: Indeed. However, you have to recognize that regulations will never be completely successful and they will always be full of holes. You must constantly be ready to fill new holes. Actually regulation should be kept to a minimum, but there has to be some cooperation between market participants and authorities -- as was the case in the early postwar years. The Bank of England was a very successful regulator by cooperating with market participants. This cooperative spirit was broken by the market fundamentalists.
SPIEGEL: Not in Germany. We have many semi-private banks that largely dominate the market. Politicians serve on their supervisory boards. But they are in particularly bad shape.
Soros: These public-private partnerships are very, very dangerous. The most rotten part of the financial system in the US consisted of the government sponsored entities, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They really kicked off this crisis. The state should set the rules and enforce them -- but not become involved as a market player.
SPIEGEL: You are one of the most powerful speculators in the world and have been heavily involved in your fund's activities over the past few months. How do you cope with the dilemma of being a speculator -- who often profits from a business transaction that might hurt society?
Soros: This is a false issue. I always play by the rules. At the same time, I try to improve the rules. In so doing I often suggest changes from which I would not personally benefit. I have the common interest at heart, not my personal interest.
SPIEGEL: But the perception many people have of you and your colleagues is very different. They blame speculators for the current financial crisis -- is that the reason for your decision to give billions of dollars to charity and your foundation?
Soros: People think I am giving money because I have pangs of conscience.
SPIEGEL: Isn't there some truth to it?
Soros: No. It is a total misconception. The big events in which I participated would have occurred whether I took part in them or not. For example, whether I had been born or not, the British pound would have been forced out of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism in 1992.
SPIEGEL: But are you really such a little wheel as you claim? If you bet against grain, rice or oil, many other investors follow suit. That could hurt consumers who can no longer afford essential foodstuffs or energy. You can definitely influence markets.
Soros: Since I became a public figure, the man who allegedly "broke the Bank of England,” I have been cast as a financial guru who can influence markets. That has actually created more moral problems for me. It has forced me to impose certain self-constraints in my statements -- exactly because I can move markets, like the investor Warren Buffett. Therefore, we try to act very responsibly.
SPIEGEL: Does the world need hedge funds?
Soros: I think that hedge funds are a very efficient way of managing money. But I clearly see the risks. Hedge funds use credit and credit is a source of instability. My conclusion is that transactions involving credit should be regulated.
SPIEGEL: Now you sound like a person who runs to a police station and tells the officers: "Please, handcuff me -- I am dangerous!"
Soros: Not really. I think there needs to be appropriate regulation of the financial markets, but it is impossible to prevent speculation. There is very little difference between speculation and investment. The only difference is basically that investments are successful speculations because if you successfully anticipate the future you make a speculative profit. I don't have a bad conscience at all. I am very proud to be a successful speculator. (SOROS重申了投机的定义,哈哈)
SPIEGEL: Average citizens are not much impressed. They no longer trust Wall Street.
Soros: That mistrust is well placed. Those very prestigious institutions on Wall Street pursue their self-interest, and that is not identical to the common interest -- which needs to be protected.
SPIEGEL: Many people also no longer have confidence in the bailout measures taken by the Bush administration. Some critics claim that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is simply trying to bail out his former colleagues on Wall Street. Paulson was once the CEO of Goldman Sachs.
Soros: That may be going too far. But it is true that Paulson sees the problems too much from the perspective of a Wall Street banker.
SPIEGEL: He is also reluctant to push for salary caps for CEOs or bonus restrictions at banks receiving government aid.

Soros: Giving government aid to a bank basically transforms it into a utility. The huge salaries in this sector are only a symptom of a more profound misalignment. The profitability of the finance industry has been excessive. For a while, 35 percent of all corporate profits in the UK and the US came from the financial sector. That was absurd.

SPIEGEL: We talked a lot about the losers of the current financial disaster. Do you also see winners?
Soros: China could easily emerge as the great winner if the Chinese leaders handle the situation well. On the other hand, they could also turn out to be the biggest losers if they handle it poorly. If the management turns out be wrong, this could lead to a political crisis in China. It's still too early to declare winners and losers.
SPIEGEL: Could Obama be the first "post-American president" -- because his country loses economic force and "soft power"?
Soros: If Obama is wise, he will find common ground with China to solve this crisis. If he wants to do it alone, we will go into a worldwide depression because America is not in a position by itself to clean up the mess it created.
SPIEGEL: Mr. Soros, thank you very much for this conversation.
Interview conducted by Mathias Müller von Blumencron, Gregor Peter Schmitz and Gabor Steingart

作者: parishunan 时间: 2008-12-10 19:38
楼主，Soros 2008新书：New Paradigm for Financial Market.pdf 好像下不了
谢谢

作者: 特立笃行 时间: 2008-12-10 22:09
1. 财务分析讲义－毕马威财务培训教材 AND 财务分析专题

pas mal
merci

作者: 檀香萦 时间: 2008-12-10 22:39
英文原版的。。。爽

作者: yuchang 时间: 2008-12-11 00:20
标题: 回复 18F 的帖子
check 了下,可以下呢,网络问题吧

作者: yuchang 时间: 2008-12-13 13:48
上传了一个M&A的讲义

作者: 特立笃行 时间: 2008-12-22 15:14
我也试了, 下载后不能解压

谢谢lz，
不过Benjamin Graham-Security Analysis下载后不能解压阿
alphand1 发表于 2008-12-7 13:55

作者: 特立笃行 时间: 2008-12-22 15:15
最近看了,
The Intelligent Investor
不错, 想继续看
Benjamin Graham-Security Analysis

作者: Lydiezhu 时间: 2008-12-23 22:27
准备好好学习一下

作者: wenhuaguan30 时间: 2008-12-25 08:54
楼主，您好。我只能下载第一个啊
剩下的貌似都过期了啊

作者: yuchang 时间: 2008-12-28 10:39
滑雪归来,不久继续整理资料,呵呵

作者: 射线 时间: 2008-12-28 21:32
LZ真是好人，赞！

作者: JAIMEAZUR 时间: 2008-12-28 22:08
长见识了

作者: hongker 时间: 2009-1-9 14:44
Merci beacoup! Je suis en train de livrer la livre

作者: liewmanhung 时间: 2009-1-10 18:02
谢谢分享。

作者: yuchang 时间: 2009-1-10 18:16
最近太忙,PROJET+PROJET,没填新东西

欢迎光临新欧洲·战法 (https://bbs.xineurope.com/)