找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

快捷登录

新浪微博登陆

搜索
CDD 法语助手

近期欧洲出血性大肠杆菌最新报告--和基因工程有关

6
回复
1336
查看
[ 复制链接 ]
头像被屏蔽

新浪微博达人勋

提示: 该帖被管理员或版主屏蔽
2011-7-1 22:52:36

新浪微博达人勋

这种致命的大肠杆菌
  事实上,大肠杆菌在每种哺乳动物体内都存在,也是人类肠道菌群的正常组成部分。这种杆菌会在婴儿出生之后,随着哺乳进入人体的肠道中,而后,与人如影随形,相伴一生。
  世卫组织资料显示,大肠杆菌通常是无害的。正常情况下,绝大多数大肠杆菌都非常安分守己,它们不但不会给我们的身体健康带来任何危害,反而还能竞争性抵御致病菌的进攻,与人体互利共生。
  虽然绝大多数大肠杆菌与我们和平相处,但仍有一些特殊的大肠杆菌能致病,严重时会危及生命,肠出血性大肠杆菌就属于大肠杆菌中颇具“攻击性”的一类。肠出血性大肠杆菌是大肠杆菌的一个亚型,主要致病菌株为O157H7,可引起感染性腹泻,因能引起人类的出血性肠炎而得名。
   中国和德国研究人员联合研究证实,这次导致德国疫情的O104H4型大肠杆菌是血清型O104大肠杆菌与另一种大肠杆菌基因组合而成的新型肠出血性大肠杆菌。
  新型的O104大肠杆菌会导致出血和严重的腹部绞痛,更为严重的病例中还会出现溶血-尿毒症综合征,破坏人体的血液细胞和肾脏。
  中国医科大学附属盛京医院感染科副主任张琳介绍,这种肠出血性大肠杆菌进入人体后,会产生大量志贺样毒素,志贺样毒素是一种蛋白质毒素,有较强的致病性,能导致腹泻、出血性结肠炎和溶血性尿毒综合征。
  英国社会科学协会主任、基因专家侯美婉在接受《国际先驱导报》采访时解释说,志贺氏菌痢疾杆菌中的志贺氏毒素基因,由噬菌体携带,将其插入了大肠杆菌染色体。
  因此,这种新型的大肠杆菌可以说是具有双重毒性。
  更为致命的是,这种新型大肠杆菌具有耐药性基因,研究人员已经发现,它至少对8种抗生素可能产生耐药性。
2011-7-1 22:52:54

使用道具 举报

新浪微博达人勋

在各种细菌间跳转
  这种耐药性的大肠杆菌,很容易让人联想起去年在印度、巴基斯坦一些国家爆发的“NDM-1超级细菌”,这种细菌也具有极强的耐药性。
  这些细菌的出现,让学界有一个普遍观点,细菌正在不断进化和成熟,它们表现出了较强的耐药性则是多年来人们滥用抗生素的结果,无论大病小病都喜欢打抗生素,导致细菌在生存压力下产生耐药性。
  以青霉素为例,本来,人类利用青霉素等抗生素是为了抑制有害细菌繁殖,不料物极必反,在大量抗生素诱导下,细菌发生了进化,产生了明显的抗药性,继续与人类为敌。
  不过,在侯美婉看来,超级菌或新病原体的产生不能单纯地归结为抗生素的大量使用和滥用,她说:“有确凿的证据说明,基因水平转移是造成抗生素抗性迅速传播和毒性病原菌出现的原因。”
  所谓基因水平转移,是指同种或不同种的生物个体之间的基因转移,往往需要通过病毒或其他作为基因携带者的传染因子,或者载体。当这些平移的基因通过这些载体进入细胞,就会同细胞中存在的其他基因发生重组,这些基因可能是细胞本身的,也可能是传染因子携带的,重组的结果即产生能致病的新组合。
  去年,在印度、巴基斯坦及欧洲一些国家出现的“NDM-1超级细菌”,NDM-1基因中只有两类细菌寄居——大肠杆菌和克雷白氏肺炎菌。医学界当时担心,该基因会转移到另外的细菌中,这使得抗生素的耐药性将快速传播。
  担心已成真,57,《印度时报》根据对第一个报告NDM-1存在的、来自卡迪夫大学的英国科学家的访问发表了一篇文章,称科学家们发现,NDM-1基因一直以“超级快的速度”在各种细菌物种之间跳转,它拥有“毫不费力在各种物种之间跳转的特殊能力。”虽然在2006年最初探测到这种基因时,只在大肠杆菌中发现了它,但是现在科学家已经在20多种不同的细菌物种中发现了NDM-1
2011-7-1 22:53:13

使用道具 举报

新浪微博达人勋


“跨界传播”风险重重
  侯美婉指出,一种细菌的基因,得以转移到另外一种细菌上,很大程度是从35年前基因工程技术运用以来加速的,“因为基因技术不断地促进基因平移和重组,导致新的病原体和耐药性的病菌产生。”
  基因工程与基因平移有何联系?生物的正常繁殖是基因由亲本向子代垂直转移,但基因工程作为一种设计出来用于在物种之间进行基因水平转移的技术,而不是靠生物的杂交。
  转基因技术的设计旨在打破物种屏障,不断地打破物种防御机制,这种防御机制在正常情况下可以造成外源基因降解或失活。天然载体则受到物种屏障的限制,比如说,猪的病毒不能侵染人,番茄病毒不能侵染花椰菜等。
  但是,基因工程构建的人工载体,由于经过一定的设计,却能打破所有的物种屏障。遗传学家使用着人工载体往往由病毒和其他致病(包括癌症)的感染因子构成,能传播毒性基因和抗生素基因等。如大肠杆菌质粒载体和噬菌体载体就常常用于转基因技术中。
  “由于大肠杆菌在基因工程中广泛使用,许多新的基因和基因组合被创造和放大,并在大肠杆菌中传播。” 候美婉说,德国爆发大肠杆菌的菌株就是通过基因平移而获得了多种抗生素耐药基因,使其对至少8种抗生素产生耐药性。
  针对有德国机构称新型大肠杆菌系生化武器说法,候美婉并不这么认为,他认为这不是有意制造出来的,“但是,基因工程比有意创造的武器更为危险的多,因为释放到环境中的转基因DNARNA被细菌吸引住,与细菌的DNARNA交换从而创造了新的病原体。”
  而业内人士认为,这才是最危险的。因为基因平移使得各个生物圈、生物界的物种同微生物群体连接起来,使得新型的病原细菌被激活并可以跨越动物植物界。262
*               *               *
2011-7-1 22:53:32

使用道具 举报

新浪微博达人勋

陈一文顾问后语:
       转基因技术失控发展、名目繁多转基因生物加速开发、泛滥,转基因安全监管失控,导致全球范围更加生物安全,还是更加生物不安全,德国致命大肠杆菌疫情的突然发作再次向人类与各国政府发出了警告!
       中国新闻周刊》20071122怪病莫吉隆斯症考验医学界 披露:
       曾经只在科幻小说或者魔幻电影中出现的这种怪病,现在看来在现实中的确存在——科学家将正式对这种新病进行研究。
    斯特福是英国的一名军官,他很想知道他的身体出了什么状况。很多年来,他在自己强烈发痒的皮肤伤口处发现有一些细小的蓝色、红色和黑色纤维长出来。这些纤维质地就像柔韧的塑料,可以长到数毫米长。斯特福说。他感觉在皮肤下面,有一些锯齿形的东西折叠着,这些东西可能像蜘蛛丝一样细,又能足够强地膨胀生长到皮肤表面,你可以像拽一根头发一样把它拽出来。
  斯特福是美国、欧洲和澳大利亚成千上万有相同症状的人之一。美国马里兰的帕马拉·温科勒说:我的胳膊、腿、耳朵的破损处都长出了黑色纤维,有痒和爬动的感觉。就像什么在到处咬你。这种情况在洗澡后尤甚。
  这种被咬的和有东西爬的感觉和使人发痒的纤维使得受害人怀疑他们患有寄生虫病。但是抗寄生虫的药物治疗却没有任何效果。……
       美国高级土壤学科学家、农业部国家植物疾病恢复系统(NPDES)、美国普渡大学名誉教授、退休上校顿·胡伯博士,过去40年一直在专业的和军事机构担任科学家,帮助对防备包括细菌战和疾病暴发在内的自然和人为生物威胁进行评估。胡伯博士写信给美国农业部长提出严重警告,提出在孟山都抗草甘膦转基因大豆与转基因玉米中新近发现普遍大量聚集的一种38000倍电子显微镜才能发现的不知名的病原体生物具有造成农业动物不育与自然流产的潜在可能,为此对人类健康可能造成的影响。胡伯博士非常清楚,这封信的内容“是高度敏感的信息,可能导致美国大豆和玉米出口市场的崩溃,并造成国内食品和饲料供应重大混乱”。
      《新快报 20110324“未知病毒”笼罩病患者 卫生部启动六省市调查披露:
       这是一群特殊的“患者”……他们又怀疑自己感染了一种现代医学目前还无法认知的、有传染性的“未知病毒”,但临床报告却显示他们“无明显器质性病变”。
    尽管在医学界专业层面还未有定论,但本着对公众健康负责的态度,卫生部门对他们反映的情况高度重视。卫生部疾病预防控制局副局长郝阳31时面见“病友代表”,表示卫生部将从北京、上海、浙江、湖南、江苏五省市开始进行流行病学调查,广东也被纳入调查的考虑范围。广东省、广州市卫生部门证实了这一情况。
  此外,经过中国CDC的多方努力,59名病友的血样也已经运输出境,美方实验室正着手准备开展检测。
    “林军”是这群“患者”口中的“大哥”,他安慰过很多试图自*杀的“患者”。他认为自己“患病”是从母亲输血开始的。

2008年,“林军”的母亲突然胃出血,在医院输了3800CCAB型血和血浆,出院后经常盗汗。“手上长皮疹,经常说手脚麻木,身上疼,关节会发出响声,身体变得消瘦”。当年5月,母亲的手背被碎玻璃划伤,“林军”收拾碎玻璃时不慎伤手沾了母亲的血,14天后出现“下巴淋巴肿大,膝关节酸胀,还能听到‘咔咔’的响声,全身都痛,吃一餐呕吐一餐;随后,左半边脸开始肿大”。
  他说,半年的时间,他的体重由原来的165斤下降到105斤。

3个月后,他发现同样的症状出现在妻子和孩子身上,都喊腿疼,孩子还经常感冒,皮肤变黑。这让“林军”感到不安,他走遍上海各大医院,均无法确诊。……
       《环球网》2011511韩国不明病毒侵袭孕妇引发恐慌 首现死亡病例》披露:
       据韩国《朝鲜日报》511消息,最近,即将分娩或刚刚分娩的7名韩国孕妇接连罹患不明原因的重症急性肺炎,入住首尔某大型医院接受治疗,其中1人因治疗无效于10日死亡。
  报道称,该不明病毒让韩国的孕妇们陷入了恐慌之中。对此,韩国卫生当局表示:尚未查明致病病毒。我们正在采取各种措施以查明确切原因。韩国疾病管理总部召集流行病学调查专业委员、感染学会等各路专家,着手调查病毒真相。据卫生当局透露,原本健康的孕妇同时患上急性肺炎,出现严重呼吸衰竭症状,在国际上也算是史无前例。
       ……
       20116月德国致命大肠杆菌疫情突然爆发,……
       人们不知道下一场“生物安全”灾难是什么,不知道它何时爆发,更不知道它在哪里爆发?
       但是,在转基因技术失控发展、名目繁多转基因生物加速开发、泛滥,转基因安全监管失控状况下,下一场“生物安全”灾难必然还要爆发却已成定局!
*               *               *
2011-7-1 22:53:49

使用道具 举报

新浪微博达人勋

2011-7-1 22:56:30

使用道具 举报

新浪微博达人勋

本帖最后由 野城 于 2011-7-3 00:33 编辑

最新研究报告



http://www.i-sis.org.uk/E_coli_O104_H4_Newly_Emergent_Pathogen.php


E. coli O104:H4 A Newly Emergent Pathogen
A deadly new strain that has picked up the Shiga toxin genes with the help of a virus that smuggles genes between bacteria


Prof. Joe Cummins

A fully referenced version of this report is posted on ISIS members website and is available for download here

The outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O104:H4 (The "O" in the serological classification identifies the cell wall lipopolysaccharide antigen, and the "H" identifies the flagella antigen) began in Germany in May 2011 [1]. Between 2 May and 14 June 2011, 3,332 cases were reported, including 818 cases of HUS (haemolytic uremic syndrome, or bloody urine) were reported from 13 European Union Member States, and 36 patients died. Over 95 percent of the afflicted were from Germany and the vast majority live in, or have travelled to northern Germany [2]. Cases were also found in US and Canada [3]. Some 100 patients have such bad kidney damage in Germany that they need an organ transplant or will require dialysis treatment for the rest of their lives, according to Karl Lauterbach, health expert for the Social Democrats party. After several weeks of searching, German authorities said the source of the outbreak was vegetable sprouts from an organic farm in Lower Saxony in northern Germany.

E. coli O104:H4 is a new strain more threatening than E. coli O157:H7 that has killed many in North America and Europe during the past thirty years.

Shiga toxin
Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) was created by the transfer of DNA from another bacterium, Shigella dysenteriae type 1, to previously harmless E. coli by a bacteriophage (virus that infects bacteria), thereby providing the resultant STEC with the genes to produce one of the most potent toxins.  HUS can also occur after S. dysenteriae type 1 infection. Convulsions may occur in children, related to a rapid rise in temperature or metabolic alterations associated with the production of the Shiga toxin. Although E. coli O157:H7 is responsible for the majority of cases in America, there are many additional STEC strains that can cause HUS [4], including O104:H4.

Shiga toxins are iron-regulated toxins that catalytically inactivate 60S ribosomal subunits of eukaryotic cells, blocking mRNA translation and causing cell death. STEC stains gained the ability to produce Shiga toxins by being infected with a prophage (phage genome integrated into the bacterial genome) containing the structural coding for the toxin, and nonproducing strains may become infected and produce Shiga toxins after incubation with Shiga toxin positive strains. The prophage responsible seems to have infected the outbreak strain fairly recently, as viral particles have been observed to replicate in the host if it is stressed, as for example, with antibiotics. That is why antibiotics are not recommended for treatment of infections with STEC.

Bacterial gene transfer
Bacteria employ a number of means of transferring genes between individuals of the same species and between widely divergent species and genera (horizontal gene transfer). Most bacteria have a single circular chromosome that may be transferred to a recipient during mating (conjugation). Genetic analysis of the complete DNA sequence of E coli O157:H7 showed that almost 20 percent of its chromosome consists of foreign DNA not present in the chromosome of E. coli K-12 (the common laboratory strain), probably acquired from other bacterial species through horizontal gene transfer [5, 6].

Prophages are copies of a virus genome inserted into a bacterial chromosome which may be activated by stress (the SOS response) to produce and release infectious virus. Prophages may incorporate bacterial genes such as the Shiga toxin genes and transmit them as infectious virus particles to be incorporated into recipient bacteria. In some cases the incorporated Shiga toxin genes are in defective prophages that are unable to produce infectious viruses {such Shiga toxin genes are flanked by insertion sequences) [7].  Shiga toxin and antibiotic resistance genes will transfer horizontally among bacteria in the house fly gut via plasmid transfer or phage transduction [8]. Plasmids are circular DNA molecules that replicate autonomously.  The toxic HUS/STEC strains maintain one or more plasmids bearing virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes.  For example, E coli O157 possesses a large virulence plasmid pO157 of approximately 90 Kb. The nucleotide sequence of this plasmid shows that it encodes 35 proteins, some of which are presumably involved in the pathogenesis [9]. In conclusion, horizontal gene transfer is of utmost importance in the genesisand perpetuationof deadly E coli strains. The direct and immediate observation of horizontal gene transfer by plasmids and transduction in the gut of house flies reflects the similar transfers taking place in the guts of vertebrates and invertebrates. Horizontal gene transfer takes place also in soil and surface water containing faeces that has not been composted sufficiently to eliminate the Shiga toxin genes.

Origin of E coli O157:H7
The toxic strain O157:H7emerged in the United states during the1980s, and has since caused illness and death globally.  Ten years ago, Mae-Wan Ho argued that genetic engineering may have contributed to the rapid evolution of E. coli 0157:H7, which has many genetic differences compared to the common harmless E. coli strain (see [10] E. coli 0157-H7 and Genetic Engineering, ISIS News 9/10). Indeed, it is legitimate to question whether genetic engineering over the past 40 years may have contributed to the accelerated rate at which new and recurrent strains of antibiotic and drug resistant pathogenic viruses and bacteria have been emerging during the same period (see [12] Gene Technology and Gene Ecology of Infectious Diseases, ISIS scientific publication). The horizontal mobility of the Shiga toxin genes and their associated virulence genes suggests that toxic strains may have been generated many times. Along with the toxin genes, the toxic strains contain plasmids bearing antibiotic resistance. For example, analysis of O157 strains from Nigeria showed that one or resistance plasmids were present and an aquatic O157 isolate containing two plasmids was resistant to seven drugs, including ampicillin, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, nalidixic acid, nitrofurantoin and tetracycline [13]. A Greek study of   milk from cows, goats and sheep  showed that all 29 E. coli O157 isolates displayed resistance to a wide range of antimicrobials, with the Shiga toxin positive isolates being, on average, resistant to a higher number of antibiotics than those which were Shiga toxin negative. All E. coli O157 isolates were found to be resistant to ampicillin, an antibiotic used in human medicine for the treatment of coliform infections, and all but one isolate (isolate LFH13) were also resistant to streptomycin. Interestingly, not one of the 9 antimicrobials tested was found to be inhibitory against all isolates. Overall, tetracycline was found to be the most inhibitory antimicrobial in terms of the number of isolates that were inhibited (27 isolates), followed by gentamicin (26 isolates) and cefuroxime (22 isolates); these three antimicrobials are also used in practice to treat human infections [13]  The spectrum of antibiotic resistance genes  in isolates of  E. coli O157 suggest that veterinary, human hospital  and research laboratories  may have contributed to the spread of the toxic bacterium and to have shaped its current development.

Origin of E. coli O104:H4
The first isolates of the E. coli O104:H4 with Shiga toxin date back to 2001, and were described by scientists as HUSEC41. It turned up again in 2006, in a woman who contracted HUS in Korea [14]. The current O104:H4 outbreak strain is a recombinant of two pathogenic E. coli types, enterohaemolytic E. coli (EHEC), causing haemolytic uremic syndrome HUS, and enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), a recognized cause of diarrhoea in children in developing countries. Recent outbreaks implicate EAEC as a cause of foodborne illness in industrialized countries. EAEC infection causes bacterial cells to form biofilms that adhere to the intestinal mucosa and elaborate enterotoxins and cytotoxins, which result in secretory diarrhoea and mucosal damage. EAEC's ability to stimulate the release of inflammatory mediators may also play a role in intestinal illness [15]. E. coli O104:H4 may have arisen through mating between male and female E. coli that produced recombinants bearing new and deadly gene combination or by repeated horizontal gene transfer, resulting in deadly strains.

E. coli O104:H4 also contains an array of antibiotic resistance genes conferring resistance to ampicillin amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/sulbactam, apiperacillin/tazobactam, cefuroxim, cefuroxim-zxetil, cefoxitin, cefotaxim, cetfazidim, streptomycin, nalidixinsäure, tetracyclin, trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazol [16], exceeding the numerous resistance genes found in previous lethal outbreaks. The antibiotics are predominantly available in medical applications.  The convergence of   multiple antibiotic resistance genes and novel toxins suggest that the lethal bacteria originated in a hospital or hospitals.

For more detailed molecular genetics of the outbreak strain see [17] How Genetic Engineering May Have Created E. Coli Outbreak, SiS 51).

Any defence?
Is there any defence against the newly emergent toxic bacteria?  Researchers found that children treated with antimicrobials had a relative risk of 14.3 of developing HUS. They concluded that antibiotic treatment of children with E coli O157:H7 gastroenteritis significantly increases the risk of developing HUS [18]. Some antibacterial drugs, including fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, increase the induction of phage-mediated production of Shiga toxin and increase the risk of development of HUS. Most authorities recommend supportive treatment only in patients with Shiga toxin–producing E. coli infection [19]. Recent animal studies found that virulence was inhibited by zinc in Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli in animals but that treatment has not yet been used with humans [20].

Composting manure may be enough to prevent the spread of toxic, foodborne E coli, if the strain is harboured by livestock. Composting manure is effective in destroying E coli as long as temperatures above 50 °C are achieved. Temperatures below 50 °C cause an initial decline in the pathogen but this is followed by a significant re-growth at lower temperatures. The pathogen was destroyed after 300 degree/days (say 6 days at 50 °C of heating).  A study from Sweden showed that E coli 0157 could survive for as much as a year in manure treated soil and in manure that had not been composted. Different strains of E coli 0157 differed in environmental survival. Urea treatment of cattle manure minimized transfer of E coli from animal to animal and hence to humans. The gene for Shiga toxin in E. coli 0157 can be transferred to relatives of E coli 0157 and even to other bacterial genera, such as Citrobacter. Parsley infected with Shiga toxin-bearing Citrobacter caused a major outbreak among people consuming parsley butter. The gene is transferred among bacterial genera by a bacteriophage Stx2. Growth of the phage was supported on compost, but the phage can be eliminated by composting during which a temperature greater than 50 °C is maintained for at least 5 days.

However, E. coli O104:H4 does not appear to be harboured by livestock, but rather by human hosts [17]. So personal hygiene especially of food handlers are of primary importance in preventing infection; giving no substance to those who try to implicate organic farming in the recent outbreak. There is a further complication; to quote the editor of the British Food Journal [21] “A common misconception is that science and research are about facts”.



2011-7-3 00:28:20

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册 新浪微博登陆

本版积分规则

返回顶部